Tagged with self-management

Billions and Billions Served

billions-served cialdini

We really are influenced when we know others have acted similarly, especially when we believe those “others” are just like us.

Imagine this: you’re a manager who needs to move people over from BlackBerrys to iPhones. You may or may not find that to be a challenging situation, but also imagine the department you are “selling” this change to was actually the department that had been in favor of using BlackBerrys to begin with years ago!

You’d be savvy if you had the insight to use social proof to show that other people within the company, and outside the company, were already adopting and feeling positive about the switch-over.

But also imagine there are still two employees in this department who are not in support of you or the initiative. You know for a fact they are not on board with the changeover, and since they are in an operations/IT capacity, you know how much you need them on board for this to be a success!

You have two choices of people who you feel can aid you as you sell the idea to them:

  • Tanya, who is not in an IT role, but as a rising star in the company, she has a lot of support within the operations/IT division. In fact, she’s a trusted source throughout the company. You know they–and others across the company–see her as a leader, which isn’t surprising, since she is strategic,  succinct and direct as a manager.
  • Ben, a quiet, “B player” type who was also on the same team that made the initial recommendation to choose BlackBerrys when the company first gave its employees cell phones. He has been in his operations/IT role for the same amount of time as the two people who are reluctant, and almost unwilling, to make this change.

Ben would be a far better person for you to use to give a testimonial about how and why he’s supportive of the move. Why? Because even though he doesn’t hold as much clout in the organization, he’s in a likeminded role as the two people who don’t agree with the change.

He’s an example of how social proof is truly activated by the idea of similarity. This is why many times the most effective testimonials on TV are the ones that feature people we feel are “just like us,” or those that show symptoms or problems that we can directly relate with.

We tend to discount how much influence other people have on our day-to-day decisions, but when we see ourselves in someone else, and they show or act in a way in support of a product or service, it’s extremely influential on us.

The other activators of social proof that can push us to follow others include:

  • A situation that could end in shame, so we act in ways to “save face,” many times in a defensive manner;
  • When there is a great deal of uncertainty around how we should act;
  • A behavior that’s made more available to us, thus making it seem more common.

Not all of these situations are necessarily negative–maybe you spoke with a friend who was “ahead” of you when it came to their personal finances/savings, or maybe it was a family member who you saw making lifestyle changes to lose weight. In turn, seeing these situations could have motivated you to start reflecting or to even make improvements to your personal life.

Can you think of situations where you were motivated when you saw a close friend or a family member take on a certain behavior? 

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

What Instagram Shows Us About Reciprocity

This is not another post about Instagram.

Well, maybe it is…but there’s nothing to be said about its privacy policy or its terms of service changes!

Instead, it’s about something that’s been on my mind recently about IG.

What I think is great about Instagram is its simplicity—the minimalist app lets you take a picture, add a filter, post it, and of course it allows you to like others’ photos.

I’ve been using IG for a short period of time compared to some—about 8 months. I’ve noticed something just plain odd when it comes to IG and my own behavior: I tend to like people’s photos more often when they have liked mine!

One of my recent photos of Findlay Market on Instagram.

Pictures is one of my recent IG photos of Findlay Market. Did I go out of the way to “like” people’s photos who gave this photo a “like”? Maybe I did, maybe I didn’t.

I’ve given it some thought, and I think it’s safe to say I feel a slight obligation when someone likes my photos. I immediately feel like I want to return what feels a bit like a favor, or a compliment! If I were to explain this to someone who doesn’t use IG, they’d think it was silly or maybe just not understand the exchange. Or, perhaps they would point to my gender!

But this isn’t just my behavior—I’ll even notice that if I like a photo of someone I don’t follow (and who doesn’t follow me, or who isn’t my friend), they will very often like my photos in return. So we see them acting in the same way I do.

We’ve all seen it on Twitter, but we don’t talk about it on Instagram—which is a more pure and simple example.

The source of influence at play here is likability (no pun intended, but it’s true) and reciprocity.

Likability comes into play in sales as we’re more likely to buy from people who are like us, from friends, or from someone we at least respect.

That’s not news to many people reading this blog–but what is surprising is that even when someone just TELLS us that they like US, we are more likely to like THEM  in return!

Want proof? There’s a well known story about Joe Girard, the number one car and truck salesmen in the US for more than a decade. He sold an average of 4.57 cars and trucks per day, excluding Sundays, on a one-on-one basis. That’s pretty remarkable. One of the ways he becomes familiar and likable to all his customers (or future potential customers) is to send out a card to them. According to Cialdini, he sends out 13,000 cards each month that simply say, “I Like You.”

That’s what he does to render authenticity and to become more likable—and he’s one of the best car salesmen of all time.

What other facets make people likable? Attractiveness, genuine similarity we have with them, being able to create a sense of cooperation, and even just being associated with positive things will make us (or brands!) more likable.

The idea of reciprocity is also working here with IG. We tend to want to give back to those who have helped us, or those who have given us a present–no matter how small that present is. It’s actually because we feel indebted to them, and we don’t like that feeling. No one, no matter the culture, wants to be considered a mooch. Reciprocity is not a complicated principle, but it applies here: we are more inclined to reach out and like a photo from someone who we know has liked our own photos in the past.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

Decision Making for Dummies

Investors and marketers are keenly aware of sandbagging: setting certain expectations at a low point, yet anticipating the ability to beat or exceed those expectations.

Why manage the expectations of consumers? Besides for obvious reasons, it is also because consumers are constantly evaluating their decisions post-purchase, in fact more often than we may realize.

The decision making process can be broken down into the following steps:

  • We have an initial perception of that (desired) product’s market.
  • We form a narrow subset of brands in that market to be considered is determined. Typically, a consideration set may be around 7 brands.
  • We make an actual selection of a brand from that consideration set.
  • We make an adjustment of our perceptions based on our experience with the product.

What’s an example of how customers analyze their purchase post-decision? When a brand meets our expectations, we as consumers are satisfied. But when that brand has exceeded our initial expectation of that performance, we are delighted…

An important part of the reason we evaluate our decisions and choices on an ongoing basis after we make a purchase: because we favor minimal cognitive dissonance.

There are four ways we do this as consumers:

  1. We will increase how attractive the brand we purchased is in our minds.
  2. We will decrease how attractive the rejected brands were in our minds.
  3. We will increase the perceived similarity between the other alternatives.
  4. We altogether reverse the choice.

In Jack Brehm’s study titled “Postdecision Changes in the Desirability of Alternatives,” he examines some of the consequences we face after we make a choice. In the study, consumers were asked to rate the attractiveness of a variety of products. Participants were told at the end of the study, they would receive one of those products as a gift.

Continue reading

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Reading List Saturday

Link roundup:

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.